Direct Payment Program in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,066
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska totaled $26,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kenneth Schleicher & Sons | Gering, NE 69341 | $70,284 |
82 | D E S K Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $69,840 |
83 | Mark Kautz | Minatare, NE 69356 | $68,953 |
84 | Kendall Busch | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $67,843 |
85 | Groskopf Land & Cattle | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $67,602 |
86 | Pheasant Land Co Llp | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $66,968 |
87 | Lazy Arrow Farms LLC | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $66,647 |
88 | Kister Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $65,679 |
89 | Roland Whitney | Minatare, NE 69356 | $65,319 |
90 | David Sherrod | Lyman, NE 69352 | $64,188 |
91 | Catron Family Limited Partnership | Kansas City, MO 64113 | $63,981 |
92 | Grentz Farms Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $63,820 |
93 | Roger Martin | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $63,694 |
94 | Dan Lynn Kisler | Bayard, NE 69334 | $63,678 |
95 | Roger L Kildow | Bayard, NE 69334 | $63,542 |
96 | Hiegel Farms Corporation | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $63,420 |
97 | Dietrich Farms Ptn | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $63,369 |
98 | Welsch Brothers Farming Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $63,194 |
99 | Strong Ag Inc | Tucson, AZ 85713 | $62,830 |
100 | Groskopf Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $62,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”