Direct Payment Program in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,066
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska totaled $26,636,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gary Weidaman Jr | Minatare, NE 69356 | $48,658 |
142 | Board Of Regents U Of N | Ithaca, NE 68033 | $48,318 |
143 | Edj Strauch | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $47,954 |
144 | Ryan Reuter | Minatare, NE 69356 | $47,839 |
145 | Jerry Greg Mackie | Gering, NE 69341 | $47,545 |
146 | Triple Diamond F LLC | Lyman, NE 69352 | $47,458 |
147 | Robert A Bennett | Gering, NE 69341 | $47,203 |
148 | Mel Hoehn LLC | Gering, NE 69341 | $45,972 |
149 | Kevin Peterson | Lyman, NE 69352 | $45,944 |
150 | Kds Farming Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $45,245 |
151 | Bauer Farms | Lyman, NE 69352 | $45,090 |
152 | Bradley Applegate | Minatare, NE 69356 | $44,517 |
153 | Andrew L Schledewitz | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $43,777 |
154 | Kanno Farms Inc | Morrill, NE 69358 | $43,501 |
155 | Henry Mark Burbach | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $43,458 |
156 | Scott Russell | Minatare, NE 69356 | $42,810 |
157 | Lawrence Stanley Schaneman Jr | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $42,734 |
158 | Thomas Family Farms Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $42,587 |
159 | Johns & Sons Inc | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $42,536 |
160 | Marilynn Kay Huck | Bayard, NE 69334 | $42,037 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”