Conservation Reserve Program in Seward County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 982
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Seward County, Nebraska totaled $32,456,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stan Litty | Seward, NE 68434 | $105,145 |
82 | William Hartmann Jr | Seward, NE 68434 | $105,121 |
83 | Denis Christjaener | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $103,057 |
84 | William W Beckler | Friend, NE 68359 | $102,698 |
85 | Kim Eberspacher | Milford, NE 68405 | $102,028 |
86 | Indian Hills Land & Cattle Co LLC | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $100,501 |
87 | Gloria J Prochnow | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $100,105 |
88 | Barth Family Rev Trust-terry E Ba | Beaver Crossing, NE 68313 | $100,007 |
89 | Vasak Family Trust | Lincoln, NE 68501 | $99,938 |
90 | Richard Prochnow | Seward, NE 68434 | $99,293 |
91 | Carl A Burkhardt Jr | Lincoln, NE 68506 | $98,716 |
92 | Virginia A Overcash | Lincoln, NE 68506 | $96,405 |
93 | Arp Investments LLC | Malcolm, NE 68402 | $96,054 |
94 | Lucille Cuda | Dwight, NE 68635 | $95,803 |
95 | Tressa M Beckler | Friend, NE 68359 | $94,729 |
96 | Vaughn L Dilley | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $93,531 |
97 | Donald Davids | Garland, NE 68360 | $92,454 |
98 | Ardath Hartmann | Seward, NE 68434 | $92,401 |
99 | Ronald W Hinrichs | Malcolm, NE 68402 | $92,369 |
100 | Chad Oborny | Garland, NE 68360 | $92,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”