Conservation Reserve Program in Seward County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 982
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Seward County, Nebraska totaled $32,456,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John Trousil | Valparaiso, NE 68065 | $91,770 |
102 | Richard R Endacott | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $91,553 |
103 | Klima Family Revocable Trust | Crete, NE 68333 | $90,028 |
104 | Carol Lynn Hudkins | Malcolm, NE 68402 | $89,965 |
105 | Schneider Ranch Co | Bee, NE 68314 | $89,834 |
106 | Neil H Naber | Waco, NE 68460 | $87,941 |
107 | Elmer H Sieck Rev Trust | Billings, MT 59101 | $87,728 |
108 | John E Brehm Sr | Lakewood, CO 80232 | $85,470 |
109 | Jerry Adams | Seward, NE 68434 | $85,110 |
110 | Rex L Owens | Seward, NE 68434 | $85,042 |
111 | Michael F Murphy | Lincoln, NE 68507 | $84,611 |
112 | Adams Farms Inc | Seward, NE 68434 | $83,675 |
113 | Ernest M Kucera | Friend, NE 68359 | $81,085 |
114 | Travis Keslar | Garland, NE 68360 | $80,832 |
115 | Jay Meyer | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $80,590 |
116 | James E Pulse Rev Trust | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $79,851 |
117 | Lorene Luebbe | Garland, NE 68360 | $79,174 |
118 | Mureen Bangert | Seward, NE 68434 | $79,040 |
119 | Ralph De Ayala | Milford, NE 68405 | $78,489 |
120 | Grace E Odvody | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $77,721 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”