Market Loss Assistance Program in Sheridan County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 728
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Sheridan County, Nebraska totaled $8,617,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kurt & Keith Carter | North Platte, NE 69101 | $45,739 |
42 | Heiting Brothers | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $45,322 |
43 | Ross L Schmidt | Gordon, NE 69343 | $45,308 |
44 | Jesse Robert Agler | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $45,192 |
45 | Wbw Corp | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $44,105 |
46 | Tk Angus Co | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $40,776 |
47 | Larson Co | Aurora, CO 80016 | $39,985 |
48 | Joe Dolezal | Rushville, NE 69360 | $39,721 |
49 | Russell Johnson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $39,636 |
50 | Sipp Cattle Co | Rushville, NE 69360 | $38,940 |
51 | Heiting Brothers | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $38,882 |
52 | Deen Johnson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $38,837 |
53 | Johnson Lazy J Inc | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $38,257 |
54 | Dolores A Svoboda Trust | Grant, NE 69140 | $37,883 |
55 | James A Johnson | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $36,992 |
56 | Dennis F Dolezal | Rushville, NE 69360 | $36,700 |
57 | Mark Pieper | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $36,293 |
58 | Wayne Davis | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $36,224 |
59 | Elmer Prokop | Maxwell, IA 50161 | $35,398 |
60 | Arthur Schaer Estate | Gordon, NE 69343 | $35,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”