Conservation Reserve Program in Sheridan County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 790
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sheridan County, Nebraska totaled $34,366,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lanny Forster | Gordon, NE 69343 | $85,083 |
122 | Kristen House | Rushville, NE 69360 | $84,476 |
123 | Vonda Ford | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $82,446 |
124 | Jerry Faulk | Rushville, NE 69360 | $81,572 |
125 | H & M Jamison Company | Gordon, NE 69343 | $80,434 |
126 | Candace D Goodrich | Gordon, NE 69343 | $79,650 |
127 | James F Wellnitz Revocable Trust | Rushville, NE 69360 | $79,204 |
128 | George Krejci | Alliance, NE 69301 | $78,981 |
129 | Kane Harold Wellnitz | Chadron, NE 69337 | $78,920 |
130 | Freeman Petersen | Rushville, NE 69360 | $78,525 |
131 | Larson Co | Aurora, CO 80016 | $78,463 |
132 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $78,441 |
133 | Stephen Johndreau | Groton, CT 06340 | $77,145 |
134 | Milton Peterson | Gordon, NE 69343 | $77,024 |
135 | Deen E Johnson Trust | Gordon, NE 69343 | $76,595 |
136 | Pat Riggleman | Gordon, NE 69343 | $76,522 |
137 | Mike Van Buskirk | Omaha, NE 68154 | $76,107 |
138 | Justin H Anderson | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $75,368 |
139 | Duane M Sandberg Trust Uad | Loveland, CO 80538 | $74,879 |
140 | Delbert L Hindman | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $74,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”