Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 311
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $5,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Nathan D Larson | Hazard, NE 68844 | $12,151 |
122 | Jerry Dethlefs | Rockville, NE 68871 | $12,059 |
123 | Gary L Dethlefs | Rockville, NE 68871 | $12,059 |
124 | Kenneth Wayne Huryta | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $12,011 |
125 | Jdi Inc | Kearney, NE 68845 | $11,961 |
126 | Scott Jay Walrath | Loup City, NE 68853 | $11,945 |
127 | Michael Gappa | Ashton, NE 68817 | $11,735 |
128 | Denise Marie Bochart | Rockville, NE 68871 | $11,486 |
129 | Aaron Michael Gorecki | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $11,486 |
130 | Austin Ryan Bochart | Ashton, NE 68817 | $11,486 |
131 | Susan Lefever | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $11,391 |
132 | Turek Cattle Co Inc | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $11,138 |
133 | Roger Rasmussen | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $11,045 |
134 | Daniel Feldman | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $10,999 |
135 | Schroll Farms LLC | Riverdale, NE 68870 | $10,929 |
136 | John Chramosta | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $10,437 |
137 | Matthew Kenton Skaggs | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $10,408 |
138 | Caleb Unick | Mason City, NE 68855 | $10,354 |
139 | Arlen Deines | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $10,318 |
140 | Blaine Goodner | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $10,289 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”