Counter Cyclical Program in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 608
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $5,594,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert A Slobaszewski | Ashton, NE 68817 | $14,901 |
122 | Kenneth K Kulwicki | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $14,786 |
123 | Classic Cattle Co | Loup City, NE 68853 | $14,729 |
124 | John Paul Kohls | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $14,711 |
125 | Scott Ray Eilenstine | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $14,575 |
126 | Richard W Bailey | Omaha, NE 68130 | $14,452 |
127 | Irvin Eugene Woitalewicz | Loup City, NE 68853 | $14,235 |
128 | Michael Allen Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $14,176 |
129 | Y Bar S Inc | Grand Junction, CO 81507 | $13,987 |
130 | Franklin Thomas Eurek | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $13,977 |
131 | Sherman Acres Inc | Rockville, NE 68871 | $13,827 |
132 | Lloyd Unick | Hazard, NE 68844 | $13,239 |
133 | Gary R Feldman | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $13,133 |
134 | Norman James Gappa | Ashton, NE 68817 | $13,071 |
135 | Robert Dick Harrington | Loup City, NE 68853 | $13,050 |
136 | Edward Leroy Krzycki | Ashton, NE 68817 | $12,948 |
137 | Robert Hurt | Ashton, NE 68817 | $12,789 |
138 | Mark Eilenstine | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $12,776 |
139 | Darrell Louis Kaminski | Loup City, NE 68853 | $12,531 |
140 | Ron Teichmeier | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $12,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”