Counter Cyclical Program in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 608
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $5,594,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kimberly Diana Reese | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $49,279 |
22 | Thomas Edwin Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $49,126 |
23 | Becky Ann Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $49,122 |
24 | Daniel Thomas Stanczyk | Ashton, NE 68817 | $48,970 |
25 | J Hammond Farms Inc | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $48,590 |
26 | Bochart Farms Inc | Rockville, NE 68871 | $47,318 |
27 | Robin Allen Bochart | Rockville, NE 68871 | $45,569 |
28 | Dale G Zoerb Rev Tr | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $44,411 |
29 | Linda S Zoerb Rev Tr | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $44,408 |
30 | Joseph Leo Jonak | Elba, NE 68835 | $44,360 |
31 | Clarence L Klimek Living Rev Tr | Loup City, NE 68853 | $43,328 |
32 | Ronald Klimek | Loup City, NE 68853 | $43,328 |
33 | Robert Allan Ksionzek | Ashton, NE 68817 | $43,132 |
34 | Connard Eugene Pierson | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $40,310 |
35 | Schultz Farms & Ranches Inc | Columbus, NE 68601 | $39,723 |
36 | Jackie Dan Chatterson | Grand Junction, CO 81507 | $39,415 |
37 | Larry Siegel | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $37,587 |
38 | Justin Joseph Kuszak | Ashton, NE 68817 | $35,973 |
39 | Eugene Carl Grudzinski | Ashton, NE 68817 | $34,757 |
40 | Scott Friesen | Loup City, NE 68853 | $34,614 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”