Loan Deficiency in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 692
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $16,459,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pvr-friesen Prtnrshp | Mason City, NE 68855 | $172,222 |
22 | Thomas Edwin Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $171,990 |
23 | H R & S Inc | Loup City, NE 68853 | $160,755 |
24 | Schultz Farms & Ranches Inc | Columbus, NE 68601 | $156,387 |
25 | Larry Siegel | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $153,753 |
26 | Clarence L Klimek Living Rev Tr | Loup City, NE 68853 | $152,096 |
27 | Ronald Klimek | Loup City, NE 68853 | $152,096 |
28 | S & S Feeders Llp | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $149,500 |
29 | Joseph Leo Jonak | Elba, NE 68835 | $143,683 |
30 | Justin Joseph Kuszak | Ashton, NE 68817 | $140,614 |
31 | Robin & Barb Irvine Jt Vt | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $140,460 |
32 | Ronnie Ray Reese | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $125,357 |
33 | Kimberly Diana Reese | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $125,331 |
34 | Robin Allen Bochart | Rockville, NE 68871 | $125,286 |
35 | Connard Eugene Pierson | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $111,506 |
36 | Randall Lee Bochart | Rockville, NE 68871 | $111,475 |
37 | Jackie Dan Chatterson | Grand Junction, CO 81507 | $110,435 |
38 | Richard Panowicz | Rockville, NE 68871 | $107,842 |
39 | Bochart Farms Inc | Rockville, NE 68871 | $106,388 |
40 | Eugene Carl Grudzinski | Ashton, NE 68817 | $103,248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”