Conservation Reserve Program in Stanton County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 223
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stanton County, Nebraska totaled $1,788,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stanley A And Faye A Schellpeper Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $14,828 |
42 | F & M Farm And Ranch LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $13,492 |
43 | Evelyn Indra | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $13,373 |
44 | Dale And Lola Denney Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $12,860 |
45 | Stanley J Sindelar Jr | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $12,240 |
46 | John C Jacobs | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $12,088 |
47 | Terral Wittgow | Denton, TX 76207 | $11,843 |
48 | Steven L Phillips | Ashland, NE 68003 | $11,815 |
49 | William W Johnson Revocable Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $11,460 |
50 | Christopher Chleboun | Glen Carbon, IL 62034 | $11,350 |
51 | J David Stepan | Leigh, NE 68643 | $11,204 |
52 | Joseph E Seda | Papillion, NE 68046 | $11,167 |
53 | Bojak Inc | Houston, TX 77079 | $10,986 |
54 | Wayne R Ohlrichs | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $10,904 |
55 | Barbara A Ohlrichs | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $10,904 |
56 | Rockwell Farms Inc | Stanton, NE 68779 | $10,598 |
57 | Michael D Lorenz | Beemer, NE 68716 | $10,536 |
58 | Samuel W Fischer | Leigh, NE 68643 | $10,077 |
59 | Jeffrey L Hansen | Stanton, NE 68779 | $10,009 |
60 | Kenneth Magsamen | Leigh, NE 68643 | $9,727 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”