Total Conservation Programs in Stanton County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 236
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stanton County, Nebraska totaled $1,871,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bill Blank Agency Inc | Madison, NE 68748 | $15,424 |
42 | J David Stepan | Leigh, NE 68643 | $15,245 |
43 | Greta J Eckstrom Living Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $15,003 |
44 | Armbrust Family Properties LLC | Gretna, NE 68028 | $14,926 |
45 | Stanley A And Faye A Schellpeper Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $14,828 |
46 | , | $14,312 | |
47 | Gloria E Balzer | Howells, NE 68641 | $13,891 |
48 | Dale And Lola Denney Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $13,852 |
49 | Ella M Voelker | Stanton, NE 68779 | $13,773 |
50 | Evelyn Indra | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $13,373 |
51 | Jack A Chace Irrevocable Trust | Wisner, NE 68791 | $13,205 |
52 | Stanley J Sindelar Jr | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $12,240 |
53 | John C Jacobs | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $12,090 |
54 | Steven L Phillips | Ashland, NE 68003 | $12,082 |
55 | Donald E Frank | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $11,799 |
56 | William W Johnson Revocable Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $11,460 |
57 | Christopher Chleboun | Glen Carbon, IL 62034 | $11,350 |
58 | Joseph E Seda | Papillion, NE 68046 | $11,167 |
59 | Bojak Inc | Houston, TX 77079 | $10,986 |
60 | Wayne R Ohlrichs | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $10,904 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”