Farm Subsidy information
Stanton County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Stanton County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 676
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanton County, Nebraska totaled $12,344,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John-hekrdle R Living Trust Hekrdle | Madison, NE 68748 | $17,860 |
122 | Klark Frederick | Stanton, NE 68779 | $17,737 |
123 | Rw Land & Cattle LLC | Madison, NE 68748 | $17,627 |
124 | Brian D. Schellpeper Revocable Trust | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $17,593 |
125 | Peony Farms LLC | Grant, NE 69140 | $17,408 |
126 | Neal Walker | Hoskins, NE 68740 | $17,400 |
127 | Hatfield & Thompson Enterprises LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $17,269 |
128 | Keith Preister | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $17,232 |
129 | Russell Fullner | Wisner, NE 68791 | $16,716 |
130 | Samuel Richard Hake | Leigh, NE 68643 | $16,661 |
131 | Steven R Hastreiter | Madison, NE 68748 | $16,627 |
132 | Roger J Kucera | Leigh, NE 68643 | $16,621 |
133 | Duane Charles Brabec | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $16,580 |
134 | Klug Brothers Ptr | Stanton, NE 68779 | $16,549 |
135 | Gerald Steffensmeier | Howells, NE 68641 | $16,245 |
136 | Armbrust Family Properties LLC | Gretna, NE 68028 | $16,218 |
137 | Michael Kabes | Leigh, NE 68643 | $15,872 |
138 | Lorena A Bernbeck Revocable Trust | Stanton, NE 68779 | $15,579 |
139 | Steven L Haffke | Papillion, NE 68046 | $15,477 |
140 | Matthias J Schuetz | Stanton, NE 68779 | $15,091 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”