Emergency Conservation Program in Washington County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 129
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Washington County, Nebraska totaled $3,714,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Papio Farms Inc | Blair, NE 68008 | $6,668 |
42 | Mark K Petersen | Blair, NE 68008 | $6,451 |
43 | The Bluffs Corporation | Omaha, NE 68154 | $6,427 |
44 | Gary V Mathiesen Living Tr | Herman, NE 68029 | $6,251 |
45 | Roger D Mathiesen Living Trust | Blair, NE 68008 | $6,250 |
46 | Damon Cornwell | Omaha, NE 68142 | $5,800 |
47 | Richard Schurman | Nickerson, NE 68044 | $5,756 |
48 | George W Tyson | Blair, NE 68008 | $5,450 |
49 | Bert Joel Hagerbaumer | Nickerson, NE 68044 | $5,410 |
50 | James Norton | Neligh, NE 68756 | $5,334 |
51 | Howard E Larsen Trust | Herman, NE 68029 | $5,310 |
52 | Virgil Wrich | Blair, NE 68008 | $5,153 |
53 | Darrell J Logemann | Bennington, NE 68007 | $4,973 |
54 | Randall G Blomker | Blair, NE 68008 | $4,629 |
55 | Sheila Lemmert | Lincoln, NE 68507 | $3,912 |
56 | Marvin R Meier | Arlington, NE 68002 | $3,908 |
57 | Fitzgerald Farms | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $3,906 |
58 | Buckeye Farm & Livestock Inc | Arlington, NE 68002 | $3,612 |
59 | Marvin H Rohwer Trust Agreement Of 1998 | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $3,602 |
60 | Evelyn Adams | Omaha, NE 68154 | $3,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”