Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Nevada, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 453
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Nevada totaled $13,866,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cannon Ranch, LLC | Hiko, NV 89017 | $51,995 |
82 | Neff Livestock & Equipment | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $50,939 |
83 | Paiute Meadows Grazing Association LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $50,511 |
84 | R N Fulstone Co | Smith, NV 89430 | $49,608 |
85 | Hanes J Holman | Carlin, NV 89822 | $49,323 |
86 | Zunino Ranches Inc | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $49,220 |
87 | Rock Creek Cattle Company LLC | Golconda, NV 89414 | $48,964 |
88 | James T Cockrell Revocable Trust | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $48,885 |
89 | Vesco Ranch LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89446 | $48,852 |
90 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $48,659 |
91 | Peter Scott | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $48,517 |
92 | Dave Stix | Fernley, NV 89408 | $48,364 |
93 | Stone Cabin Ranch, LLC | Tonopah, NV 89049 | $48,271 |
94 | Kevin Tomera | Spring Creek, NV 89815 | $48,126 |
95 | Star Creek Ranch LLC | Imlay, NV 89418 | $48,035 |
96 | Shewmaker Bros Inc | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $46,898 |
97 | , | $46,161 | |
98 | Duval Ranching Co | Ruby Valley, NV 89833 | $45,734 |
99 | Young Brothers | Austin, NV 89310 | $45,479 |
100 | Cross 7 Livestock, LLC | Eureka, NV 89316 | $45,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”