Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lincoln County, Nevada, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lincoln County, Nevada totaled $4,886,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lazy D Livestock, Inc | Pioche, NV 89043 | $449,107 |
2 | Tule Ranch Management LLC | St George, UT 84790 | $318,535 |
3 | Bradley K Guymon | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $272,984 |
4 | , | $269,855 | |
5 | E Ray Okelberry Joint Venture | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $247,949 |
6 | Robert Steele | Alamo, NV 89001 | $232,759 |
7 | Dick Clark Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $232,450 |
8 | Jared W Cornelius | Kanarraville, UT 84742 | $213,643 |
9 | Arlin S Hughes | Veyo, UT 84782 | $204,277 |
10 | John Uhalde & Co | Ely, NV 89315 | $201,436 |
11 | Geyser Cattle Company, LLC | Pioche, NV 89043 | $181,108 |
12 | Cannon Ranch, LLC | Hiko, NV 89017 | $178,176 |
13 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $155,544 |
14 | Lytle Ranches Corp | Pioche, NV 89043 | $152,907 |
15 | 3j Cattle LLC | Caliente, NV 89008 | $143,261 |
16 | Trever L Wade | Alamo, NV 89001 | $135,618 |
17 | Lamont Wadsworth | Hiko, NV 89017 | $121,927 |
18 | Tony Steele | Alamo, NV 89001 | $121,512 |
19 | Legrande Webster | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $118,834 |
20 | Chad Steele | Lamoille, NV 89828 | $91,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>