Total Commodity Programs in Pershing County, Nevada, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 182
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pershing County, Nevada totaled $9,982,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Great Basin Farms | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $126,301 |
22 | Star Creek Ranch LLC | Imlay, NV 89418 | $122,635 |
23 | Michael Gottschalk Family Trust | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $108,262 |
24 | Running W Ranch LLC | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $99,671 |
25 | Moura Ranch | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $90,619 |
26 | J Kenneth & Alijandra Carpenter | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $88,365 |
27 | Gene A Brinkerhoff Inc | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $83,309 |
28 | Demas Family Farms, LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $82,583 |
29 | Knisley Farms Inc | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $81,428 |
30 | Moura Ranch LLC | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $80,819 |
31 | Duncan Family 2002 Trust | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $78,805 |
32 | James Estill | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $75,723 |
33 | Carl F Clinger | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $70,388 |
34 | 3-h Corporation | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $66,832 |
35 | Michael Gottschalk Family Trust | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $65,742 |
36 | Marvel Land And Livestock, LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $63,096 |
37 | D S Ranches Limited Liability Com | Reno, NV 89511 | $57,277 |
38 | Johnson Ranch Inc | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $56,819 |
39 | Monroe Ranch Inc | Reno, NV 89509 | $56,630 |
40 | Salvador And Rosa Olagaray | Lodi, CA 95242 | $54,639 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”