Total Disaster Programs in Washoe County, Nevada, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 241
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Washoe County, Nevada totaled $17,381,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Will J Cockrell Dba Cockrell Lc Cattle Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $270,560 |
22 | Archie Osborne | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $244,080 |
23 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $237,511 |
24 | Fee Ranch Inc | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $225,021 |
25 | John Bunyard | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $201,459 |
26 | Jack Bassett | Reno, NV 89512 | $192,674 |
27 | Robert L Cockrell Ranch LLC | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $190,910 |
28 | Mad Dog Cattle Company | Wells, NV 89835 | $182,012 |
29 | Timothy J Lawson | Fallon, NV 89406 | $180,687 |
30 | James T Cockrell Revocable Trust | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $175,980 |
31 | Jackson Ranch | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $160,892 |
32 | Archie Osborne | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $156,754 |
33 | Carissa L Jones | Adel, OR 97620 | $150,398 |
34 | Ed Hill | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $148,988 |
35 | Dellis Bone | Reno, NV 89506 | $143,730 |
36 | Timothy J Lawson | Imlay, NV 89418 | $139,456 |
37 | La Rue Family Partners Limited Pa | Reno, NV 89510 | $125,317 |
38 | , | $125,177 | |
39 | Stephen James | Wadsworth, NV 89442 | $113,655 |
40 | Toy Edward Pryor | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $113,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”