Farm Subsidy information
Washoe County, Nevada
Total Subsidies in Washoe County, Nevada, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 275
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washoe County, Nevada totaled $27,114,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $1,134,072 |
2 | Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe | Nixon, NV 89424 | $878,055 |
3 | Coleman Valley Livestock LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $797,878 |
4 | Grove Brothers | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $773,558 |
5 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $574,648 |
6 | Will J Cockrell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $551,824 |
7 | James T Cockrell | Lake City, CA 96115 | $520,148 |
8 | John Espil Sheep Co Inc | Sparks, NV 89436 | $507,125 |
9 | Damonte Ranch LLC | Reno, NV 89511 | $462,594 |
10 | Dave Stix | Fernley, NV 89408 | $396,020 |
11 | John Guerrero | Wadsworth, NV 89442 | $370,483 |
12 | G B Selmi & Cecil Courtney | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $313,440 |
13 | Zz30 LLC | Sparks, NV 89432 | $312,271 |
14 | John Raymond Cooper | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $300,512 |
15 | John Still | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $299,137 |
16 | Alan L Mendes | Reno, NV 89510 | $282,576 |
17 | Erquiaga Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $260,702 |
18 | Fee Ranch Inc | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $245,798 |
19 | Archie Osborne | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $244,080 |
20 | William Stevenson | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $232,548 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>