Total Disaster Programs in Washoe County, Nevada, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 241
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Washoe County, Nevada totaled $17,381,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grove Brothers | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $942,354 |
2 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $927,634 |
3 | John Espil Sheep Co Inc | Sparks, NV 89436 | $883,505 |
4 | Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe | Nixon, NV 89424 | $788,131 |
5 | Coleman Valley Livestock LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $780,259 |
6 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $687,744 |
7 | Will J Cockrell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $551,824 |
8 | James T Cockrell | Lake City, CA 96115 | $520,148 |
9 | Dave Stix | Fernley, NV 89408 | $396,020 |
10 | John Still | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $373,044 |
11 | Zz30 LLC | Sparks, NV 89432 | $350,716 |
12 | Erquiaga Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $339,624 |
13 | G B Selmi & Cecil Courtney | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $313,402 |
14 | Damonte Ranch LLC | Reno, NV 89511 | $305,956 |
15 | Alan L Mendes | Reno, NV 89510 | $300,896 |
16 | John Guerrero | Wadsworth, NV 89442 | $300,790 |
17 | John Raymond Cooper | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $300,512 |
18 | William Stevenson | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $286,436 |
19 | Timothy Reed Martinez | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $283,023 |
20 | Robert & Debra Depaoli | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $278,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>