Total Commodity Programs in New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,669
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New Hampshire totaled $67,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rocky Hill Farm | Haverhill, NH 03765 | $151,416 |
102 | Estate Of Dr Eugene Hussey | Fryeburg, ME 04037 | $150,080 |
103 | Putnam Farm Of Piermont | Piermont, NH 03779 | $145,731 |
104 | Burl Land Clearing LLC | Manchester, NH 03109 | $144,551 |
105 | Barbara And David Fernald | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $144,290 |
106 | John W Luther | Acworth, NH 03601 | $144,015 |
107 | Leanne Downs | Loudon, NH 03307 | $141,311 |
108 | Westminster Farms Inc | Westminster Station, VT 05159 | $140,409 |
109 | Chester J Walker Jr | Bristol, NH 03222 | $140,235 |
110 | H Covert & L Knapton | Piermont, NH 03779 | $140,029 |
111 | James Downs | Loudon, NH 03307 | $139,475 |
112 | Timothy J Towle | Pittsfield, NH 03263 | $139,046 |
113 | La Casa De Leche LLC | Alstead, NH 03602 | $137,477 |
114 | Gregory Clark | Cornish Flat, NH 03746 | $135,842 |
115 | Hatchland Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $135,522 |
116 | Sunnycrest Farm, Inc | Londonderry, NH 03053 | $133,775 |
117 | Scott R Mason | North Stratford, NH 03590 | $131,936 |
118 | Ath-mor Holsteins Inc | Lee, NH 03824 | $131,102 |
119 | Nelson Farms Inc | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $128,916 |
120 | Grafton County Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $128,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”