Environmental Quality Incentives Program in New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 330
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in New Hampshire totaled $2,825,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Carbee Valley Farm | Bath, NH 03740 | $4,125 |
162 | Carolyn Danielson | Haverhill, NH 03765 | $4,109 |
163 | Windswept Maples | Loudon, NH 03307 | $4,032 |
164 | Rocky Hill Farm | Haverhill, NH 03765 | $4,002 |
165 | Alan & Scott Bartlett | Concord, NH 03301 | $3,984 |
166 | Chris Hawkins | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $3,975 |
167 | Richard Silver | Farmington, NH 03835 | $3,965 |
168 | Patch Orchards Inc | Lebanon, NH 03766 | $3,923 |
169 | Karen J Johnson Spencer | Raymond, NH 03077 | $3,863 |
170 | Mark A Salisbury | Temple, NH 03084 | $3,842 |
171 | Susan Richardson | Boscawen, NH 03303 | $3,767 |
172 | James Richardson | Boscawen, NH 03303 | $3,767 |
173 | Austin C Sass | Madbury, NH 03820 | $3,750 |
174 | John W Luther | Acworth, NH 03601 | $3,567 |
175 | Karen Grybko | Lyndeborough, NH 03082 | $3,564 |
176 | Baker Family Irr Trust Of 1993 | Orford, NH 03777 | $3,531 |
177 | Richard Goff | Freedom, NH 03836 | $3,500 |
178 | Sherman Farm, LLC | Center Conway, NH 03813 | $3,500 |
179 | Patti & Ray Bateman | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $3,500 |
180 | Monadnock Community Land Trust | Wilton, NH 03086 | $3,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”