Farm Subsidy information
Cheshire County, New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in Cheshire County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cheshire County, New Hampshire totaled $8,101,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chickering Farm Inc | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $1,190,974 |
2 | Windyhurst Farm Partnership | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $982,324 |
3 | Crescent Farm | Walpole, NH 03608 | $367,040 |
4 | Kelly Brothers | Winchester, NH 03470 | $365,670 |
5 | Alyson's Apple Orchard Inc | Walpole, NH 03608 | $341,858 |
6 | Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow Farm | Walpole, NH 03608 | $310,433 |
7 | Echo Farm Inc | Hinsdale, NH 03451 | $282,068 |
8 | Vincent Malnati | Walpole, NH 03608 | $269,187 |
9 | Stoneholm Farm LLC | Putney, VT 05346 | $229,728 |
10 | Roy W Homan | Chester, VT 05143 | $203,199 |
11 | Donald H Wood Jr | Alstead, NH 03602 | $177,844 |
12 | Westminster Farms Inc | Westminster Station, VT 05159 | $140,409 |
13 | Bradley A Fletcher | Walpole, NH 03608 | $134,963 |
14 | Britton Farm LLC | Walpole, NH 03608 | $132,491 |
15 | Cheshire Cty Farm | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $115,411 |
16 | Alfred L Britton | Walpole, NH 03608 | $112,752 |
17 | Putnam Farms Inc | Charlestown, NH 03603 | $96,731 |
18 | Albert Hudson | Hinsdale, NH 03451 | $94,374 |
19 | Gary A Beaman | Hinsdale, NH 03451 | $84,504 |
20 | Moniz Farm | Hinsdale, NH 03451 | $83,420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>