Production Flexibility Program in Grafton County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 125
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Grafton County, New Hampshire totaled $608,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thistle Knob Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $8,104 |
22 | Orman M Thayer | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $8,074 |
23 | Robert Mitchell Farm | Piermont, NH 03779 | $8,034 |
24 | Jalco Farm | Haverhill, NH 03765 | $7,072 |
25 | Hatchland Farm LLC | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $6,666 |
26 | Taylor Farm | Orford, NH 03777 | $6,550 |
27 | Ronald Everett Keith | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $6,482 |
28 | Patch Orchards Inc | Lebanon, NH 03766 | $6,333 |
29 | Gary Peters Farm | Bath, NH 03740 | $6,328 |
30 | Robie Family Trust | Piermont, NH 03779 | $6,296 |
31 | Edward F Cadreact | Pike, NH 03780 | $6,261 |
32 | David Keith Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $6,070 |
33 | Walhowdon Farm | Lebanon, NH 03766 | $5,746 |
34 | Eden D Aldrich | Woodsville, NH 03785 | $5,679 |
35 | David W Clement | Landaff, NH 03585 | $5,460 |
36 | Woodbourne Farm Inc | Bath, NH 03740 | $5,051 |
37 | James H Peavey | Bradford, VT 05033 | $4,499 |
38 | Elwyn M Gibson | Monroe, NH 03771 | $4,324 |
39 | Alan Sprague | Warren, NH 03279 | $3,951 |
40 | Howard B Ward Jr | Monroe, NH 03771 | $3,586 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”