Farm Subsidy information
Grafton County, New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in Grafton County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grafton County, New Hampshire totaled $21,356,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | West View Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $108,891 |
42 | Cassidy Timber Harvesting | Pike, NH 03780 | $106,280 |
43 | River Valley Farm | Orford, NH 03777 | $106,186 |
44 | Russell & Mary Hicks | Lisbon, NH 03585 | $105,766 |
45 | Arend Tensen | Lyme, NH 03768 | $102,988 |
46 | Lisa Knapton | Piermont, NH 03779 | $98,709 |
47 | Daniel R Bailey | Lyme, NH 03768 | $98,231 |
48 | Harold D Covert | Piermont, NH 03779 | $93,413 |
49 | Michael Sharp Enterprises LLC | Bristol, NH 03222 | $93,046 |
50 | Walter M Gladstone | Bradford, VT 05033 | $92,735 |
51 | William Minot II | Bath, NH 03740 | $91,809 |
52 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $91,194 |
53 | Paul L Boutin Jr | Littleton, NH 03561 | $89,102 |
54 | James Linn | Canaan, NH 03741 | $88,240 |
55 | Matthew J Cadreact | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $87,520 |
56 | Justin L Smith | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $87,268 |
57 | Scott & Colleen Johnston | Canaan, NH 03741 | $87,124 |
58 | Blackmount Farm | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $84,049 |
59 | Silas Locke Dairy Farm | Bath, NH 03740 | $80,279 |
60 | Peters Logging | Landaff, NH 03585 | $79,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”