Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Merrimack County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 89
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Merrimack County, New Hampshire totaled $1,692,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Timothy J Towle | Pittsfield, NH 03263 | $18,550 |
22 | Ernest Roberts | Loudon, NH 03307 | $17,944 |
23 | Gordon Jones | Chichester, NH 03258 | $17,206 |
24 | Alan & Scott Bartlett | Concord, NH 03301 | $17,024 |
25 | Larry Pletcher | Warner, NH 03278 | $16,299 |
26 | Leanne Downs | Loudon, NH 03307 | $13,296 |
27 | Marston Farm LLC | Pittsfield, NH 03263 | $12,987 |
28 | Mapleshade Farm LLC | Franklin, NH 03235 | $12,412 |
29 | Gould Hill Farm LLC | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $12,062 |
30 | James Downs | Loudon, NH 03307 | $11,562 |
31 | Rossview Farm LLC | Concord, NH 03303 | $11,503 |
32 | Hackleboro Orchards | Canterbury, NH 03224 | $11,197 |
33 | Windswept Maples | Loudon, NH 03307 | $10,751 |
34 | Warner River Produce LLC | Webster, NH 03303 | $9,724 |
35 | Generation Farm LLC | Concord, NH 03301 | $9,535 |
36 | Tops In Crops LLC | Gilmanton, NH 03237 | $9,180 |
37 | Jay Pritchard | Pembroke, NH 03275 | $8,667 |
38 | Dimond Hill Farm LLC | Concord, NH 03301 | $7,910 |
39 | J & E Farm LLC | Concord, NH 03301 | $7,822 |
40 | New Orchard Farm | Epsom, NH 03234 | $7,756 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”