Total Commodity Programs in Merrimack County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 212
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merrimack County, New Hampshire totaled $16,240,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jason Curtis Outdoor Services Inc | Deerfield, NH 03037 | $65,059 |
42 | Lavalley Farms, LLC | Allenstown, NH 03275 | $62,774 |
43 | New Orchard Farm | Epsom, NH 03234 | $61,728 |
44 | Maple Shade Farm | Franklin, NH 03235 | $61,590 |
45 | Samuel A And Thomas E Marston | Pittsfield, NH 03263 | $61,167 |
46 | New Orchard Farm | Epsom, NH 03234 | $60,043 |
47 | Harold Corliss | Northfield, NH 03276 | $53,632 |
48 | Carter Hill Orchard | Concord, NH 03303 | $53,577 |
49 | Triple L Lumber Company Inc | Henniker, NH 03242 | $52,595 |
50 | Tops In Crops LLC | Gilmanton, NH 03237 | $52,035 |
51 | Fwd Moody Chipping LLC | Boscawen, NH 03303 | $48,746 |
52 | Alexander Jordan | Warner, NH 03278 | $46,941 |
53 | Brian Shaw Farm | Andover, NH 03216 | $42,398 |
54 | Daniel L Fife | Franklin, NH 03235 | $39,002 |
55 | Windswept Maples | Loudon, NH 03307 | $37,843 |
56 | Gould Hill Orchards | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $36,659 |
57 | Sloping Acres Farm | Canterbury, NH 03224 | $35,667 |
58 | Bruce Holmes | Alton, NH 03809 | $34,959 |
59 | Robert Lee | Allenstown, NH 03275 | $34,680 |
60 | Apple Hill Farm | Concord, NH 03301 | $32,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”