Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in Rockingham County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 119
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in Rockingham County, New Hampshire totaled $518,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Randy C Jones | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
62 | Charles H Felch III | Seabrook, NH 03874 | $4,374 |
63 | John G Noble | Hampton, NH 03842 | $4,374 |
64 | Philip J Slingsby | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
65 | Aaron Marconi | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
66 | Peter Walker | Rye, NH 03870 | $4,374 |
67 | Gregory Ward | New Castle, NH 03854 | $4,374 |
68 | Michelle Marconi | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
69 | Toby Heisey | Rye, NH 03870 | $4,374 |
70 | Michael Pawluk | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
71 | Kyle Dodier | Hampton, NH 03842 | $4,374 |
72 | Erick Willwerth | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
73 | Wayne N Driscoll | Hampton, NH 03842 | $4,374 |
74 | Vincent J Marconi | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
75 | Charles H Felch | Seabrook, NH 03874 | $4,374 |
76 | Jonathan B Drake | Rye, NH 03870 | $4,374 |
77 | Stephen M Joyce | Hampton, NH 03842 | $4,374 |
78 | Gregory A Marshall | Seabrook, NH 03874 | $4,374 |
79 | William T Marconi | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $4,374 |
80 | Scott D Heisey | Rye, NH 03870 | $4,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”