Farm Subsidy information
Rockingham County, New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in Rockingham County, New Hampshire, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 382
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rockingham County, New Hampshire totaled $9,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert Dolloff Revocable Trust | New Boston, NH 03070 | $6,800 |
122 | Arthur Dolloff Revocable | Derry, NH 03038 | $6,800 |
123 | Matthew J Fessenden | Portsmouth, NH 03801 | $6,796 |
124 | Rally Cap LLC | Windham, NH 03087 | $6,787 |
125 | Reginald Sharp | Newfields, NH 03856 | $6,769 |
126 | Henry Brandt | North Hampton, NH 03862 | $6,553 |
127 | John P Heisey | Rye, NH 03870 | $6,500 |
128 | Aj Lobster LLC | Hampton, NH 03842 | $6,400 |
129 | Farren Dana Mullikin | Greenland, NH 03840 | $6,386 |
130 | Vicki M Felch | Seabrook, NH 03874 | $6,342 |
131 | Clinton Furnald | South Hampton, NH 03827 | $6,326 |
132 | Geary Hurd | Hampton, NH 03842 | $6,320 |
133 | Jeffrey R Booth | Newfields, NH 03856 | $6,316 |
134 | Arthur Splaine | Rye, NH 03870 | $6,316 |
135 | Jason Lemos | Rye, NH 03870 | $6,256 |
136 | James Boynton | Newmarket, NH 03857 | $6,254 |
137 | Boyd D. Chivers | Candia, NH 03034 | $6,237 |
138 | Coombs Farm LLC | Kingston, NH 03848 | $6,202 |
139 | Bruce Levis | East Kingston, NH 03827 | $6,114 |
140 | Pinewoods Yankee Farm | Lee, NH 03861 | $6,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”