Farm Subsidy information
Strafford County, New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in Strafford County, New Hampshire, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 233
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Strafford County, New Hampshire totaled $4,054,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John A Hutton III | Lee, NH 03861 | $22,984 |
22 | James E Newick | Lee, NH 03861 | $21,777 |
23 | A W Greymont Jr Trucking | New Durham, NH 03855 | $19,011 |
24 | Brandmoore Farm | Rollinsford, NH 03869 | $18,843 |
25 | Little Bay Buffalo Company | Durham, NH 03824 | $18,215 |
26 | Blue Hills Foundation | Boston, MA 02109 | $18,060 |
27 | Lionel Paradis Jr | Dover, NH 03820 | $17,555 |
28 | William Bartlett | Farmington, NH 03835 | $17,013 |
29 | Marie T Mead | Cos Cob, CT 06807 | $16,500 |
30 | John Rines Estate | Alton, NH 03809 | $16,250 |
31 | Lev Baesh | Barrington, NH 03825 | $15,000 |
32 | Paul R Ford | Rochester, NH 03868 | $14,914 |
33 | Elliott & Williams Roses Inc | Dover, NH 03821 | $14,841 |
34 | Robert W Hayes Jr | Farmington, NH 03835 | $14,640 |
35 | Joshua F Ford | Rollinsford, NH 03869 | $14,620 |
36 | F/v Lisa Ann Fisheries LLC | Barrington, NH 03827 | $13,757 |
37 | Donna L Howard | Strafford, NH 03884 | $12,879 |
38 | William Melville | Rochester, NH 03867 | $12,869 |
39 | Norman W Moore | Lee, NH 03861 | $12,459 |
40 | Ruth Scruton | Farmington, NH 03835 | $11,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”