Conservation Reserve Program in New Jersey, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 160
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in New Jersey totaled $168,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Genoa Farms Inc | Vineland, NJ 08360 | $217 |
122 | Mitchell Jones | Washington, NJ 07882 | $216 |
123 | Lois English | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $216 |
124 | Timothy Dunne | Belvidere, NJ 07823 | $214 |
125 | Charles Muzzarelli Jr | Vineland, NJ 08360 | $202 |
126 | Jean Marie Macnaughton Estate | Titusville, NJ 08560 | $194 |
127 | Wellacrest Farms Inc | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $192 |
128 | Gerald F Lyness | Pittstown, NJ 08867 | $192 |
129 | Jim Coombs LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $189 |
130 | Charles Hurff | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $185 |
131 | Formisano Farms Inc | Buena, NJ 08310 | $179 |
132 | Burtis F Myers Jr | Mount Holly, NJ 08060 | $174 |
133 | M R Dickinson And Son Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $170 |
134 | Alstede Farms LLC | Chester, NJ 07930 | $169 |
135 | Robert Todd Gaum | Cream Ridge, NJ 08514 | $158 |
136 | Michael Rooney | Sewell, NJ 08080 | $153 |
137 | Edward B Olbrich | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $152 |
138 | Andrew Borisuk Jr | Vernon, NJ 07462 | $151 |
139 | John B Bitter III | Salem, NJ 08079 | $146 |
140 | Tracy Stites | Salem, NJ 08079 | $132 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”