Farm Subsidy information
New Jersey
Total Subsidies in New Jersey, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,080
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Jersey totaled $421,905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wellacrest Farms Inc | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $2,938,449 |
2 | Good Farms Inc | Southampton, NJ 08088 | $2,472,882 |
3 | Zrh Farms LLC | Pedricktown, NJ 08067 | $2,413,572 |
4 | Spina Farms LLC | Salem, NJ 08079 | $2,178,246 |
5 | Robert A Santini | Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 | $2,154,798 |
6 | Rustin Farms | West Windsor, NJ 08550 | $1,898,818 |
7 | Alstede Farms LLC | Chester, NJ 07930 | $1,768,615 |
8 | Rodrigo M Duarte | Newark, NJ 07105 | $1,706,400 |
9 | Deb El Food Products LLC | Newark, NJ 07102 | $1,500,000 |
10 | S & J Leone | Clarksboro, NJ 08020 | $1,462,253 |
11 | Dubois' Spring Brook Farms LLC | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $1,341,739 |
12 | Martin J Catalano | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $1,294,593 |
13 | Parsons Mariculture LLC | Tuckerton, NJ 08087 | $1,283,627 |
14 | J & S Brothers Farms LLC | Harrisonville, NJ 08039 | $1,275,193 |
15 | Tranquillity Farms LLC | Andover, NJ 07821 | $1,229,644 |
16 | Birches Cranberry Company | Southampton, NJ 08088 | $1,218,040 |
17 | Hw Bibus & Son Inc | Chesterfield, NJ 08515 | $1,199,900 |
18 | Myerwood Farms LLC | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $1,186,252 |
19 | Jim Wenger Farms | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $1,165,405 |
20 | John W Cook | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $1,136,952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>