Farm Subsidy information
Cumberland County, New Jersey
Total Subsidies in Cumberland County, New Jersey, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 388
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cumberland County, New Jersey totaled $41,076,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lee C Mixner | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $165,891 |
42 | A. Pagnini Farms & Greenhouses Ll | Vineland, NJ 08361 | $163,059 |
43 | Watson Farms | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $162,071 |
44 | Buster Petronglo & Son Farm LLC | Newfield, NJ 08344 | $155,558 |
45 | Charles E Paulaitis III | Cedarville, NJ 08311 | $154,770 |
46 | Chestnut Run Farm Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $152,983 |
47 | Rabbit Hill Farms LLC | Shiloh, NJ 08353 | $150,745 |
48 | Bergamo Brothers Farms LLC | Vineland, NJ 08361 | $148,494 |
49 | Wide Sky Farms Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $147,658 |
50 | Franklin T Atkinson Jr | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $146,285 |
51 | Jay Vee Inc | Rosenhayn, NJ 08352 | $140,004 |
52 | Carroll Ansink | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $138,658 |
53 | Shiloh Farms LLC | Berkeley Spgs, WV 25411 | $138,242 |
54 | , | $135,260 | |
55 | Van Meter Farms Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $131,353 |
56 | Adamucci Farms Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $130,318 |
57 | Coombs Sod Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $119,436 |
58 | Alex R Tonetta | Vineland, NJ 08361 | $119,109 |
59 | Davis Farm LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $114,651 |
60 | Douglas K Mehaffey Jr | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $112,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”