Market Loss Assistance Program in Gloucester County, New Jersey, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Gloucester County, New Jersey totaled $760,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George C Lewis Jr | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $8,820 |
22 | Dominic J Racite | Woolwich Twp, NJ 08085 | $8,118 |
23 | Blacks Dairy Farm | Swedesboro, NJ 08085 | $7,606 |
24 | David Griffin | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $7,397 |
25 | Circle M Farms LLC | Salem, NJ 08079 | $7,075 |
26 | John R Banscher | Gibbstown, NJ 08027 | $6,932 |
27 | Previtera Farms | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $5,750 |
28 | Creamy Acres Farm LLC | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $5,656 |
29 | Gladys A Pool | Mickleton, NJ 08056 | $4,975 |
30 | Samuel Maccarone T/a Early Acres | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $4,352 |
31 | David R Hunt | Logan Township, NJ 08085 | $4,130 |
32 | Kimberly Y Marple | West Deptford, NJ 08096 | $3,818 |
33 | John Pool | Mickleton, NJ 08056 | $2,938 |
34 | William R Stefka | Gibbstown, NJ 08027 | $2,225 |
35 | Nicolosi Brothers | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $2,130 |
36 | Thomas & Frank Sorbello | Swedesboro, NJ 08085 | $1,706 |
37 | Jeffrey A Thies | Newfield, NJ 08344 | $1,704 |
38 | Maugeri Farms | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $1,153 |
39 | Carmen Visalli | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $967 |
40 | Santo Joseph Maccherone | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $821 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”