Farm Subsidy information
Gloucester County, New Jersey
Total Subsidies in Gloucester County, New Jersey, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 93
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gloucester County, New Jersey totaled $2,963,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Philip Reuter | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $7,008 |
42 | James Visalli | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $6,556 |
43 | Viereck Farms LLC | Woolwich Twp, NJ 08085 | $6,047 |
44 | James J Rambo | Glassboro, NJ 08028 | $5,637 |
45 | David R Hunt | Logan Township, NJ 08085 | $5,430 |
46 | Joseph M Leshay | Newfield, NJ 08344 | $5,300 |
47 | Joseph A Dibella | Woolwich Township, NJ 08085 | $5,177 |
48 | Alfred J Maccherone | Sewell, NJ 08080 | $4,679 |
49 | Lester Shoemaker Jr | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $4,676 |
50 | Alvin W String Jr | Harrisonville, NJ 08039 | $4,483 |
51 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $4,373 |
52 | Cassaday Farms LLC | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $4,028 |
53 | Joseph H Bilinski | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $3,763 |
54 | Heilig Orchards Inc | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $3,074 |
55 | Santo Joseph Maccherone | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $2,582 |
56 | Lucy M Caltabiano | Mickleton, NJ 08056 | $2,560 |
57 | Muth Farm Flowers LLC | Williamstown, NJ 08094 | $2,369 |
58 | James Farro Dba Fool Pen Farms | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $2,152 |
59 | Diane Pioppi | Newfield, NJ 08344 | $2,102 |
60 | George A Thies Jr | Newfield, NJ 08344 | $1,864 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”