Farm Subsidy information
Salem County, New Jersey
Total Subsidies in Salem County, New Jersey, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 652
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Salem County, New Jersey totaled $81,577,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zrh Farms LLC | Pedricktown, NJ 08067 | $2,316,127 |
2 | Spina Farms LLC | Salem, NJ 08079 | $2,178,246 |
3 | Dubois' Spring Brook Farms LLC | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $1,325,159 |
4 | Martin J Catalano | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $1,294,593 |
5 | Myerwood Farms LLC | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $1,186,252 |
6 | Myers Farms LLC | Woodstown, NJ 08098 | $1,074,950 |
7 | Scott Robinson | Salem, NJ 08079 | $1,007,744 |
8 | Waldac Farm Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $1,000,400 |
9 | Joseph P Ayars | Salem, NJ 08079 | $937,360 |
10 | Byrnes & Byrnes | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $901,636 |
11 | H & S Dubois | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $900,835 |
12 | Allen Farms Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $797,252 |
13 | Catalano Farms Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $796,159 |
14 | Michael Catalano T/a M & J Catalano Farms | Salem, NJ 08079 | $752,848 |
15 | Dusty Lane Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $750,738 |
16 | Harvey's Honey Inc | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $709,859 |
17 | Myerwood Farms | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $700,302 |
18 | John W Cook | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $694,715 |
19 | Wood Farms | Salem, NJ 08079 | $665,000 |
20 | Cassaday Farms LLC | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $655,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>