Farm Subsidy information
Salem County, New Jersey
Total Subsidies in Salem County, New Jersey, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 636
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Salem County, New Jersey totaled $71,241,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zrh Farms LLC | Pedricktown, NJ 08067 | $1,533,720 |
2 | Dubois' Spring Brook Farms LLC | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $1,131,624 |
3 | Martin J Catalano | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $1,122,952 |
4 | Myers Farms LLC | Woodstown, NJ 08098 | $1,067,479 |
5 | Scott Robinson | Salem, NJ 08079 | $1,000,941 |
6 | Myerwood Farms LLC | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $999,066 |
7 | Joseph P Ayars | Salem, NJ 08079 | $917,098 |
8 | Byrnes & Byrnes | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $901,636 |
9 | H & S Dubois | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $900,835 |
10 | Waldac Farm Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $858,403 |
11 | Allen Farms Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $782,213 |
12 | Dusty Lane Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $748,666 |
13 | Michael Catalano T/a M & J Catalano Farms | Salem, NJ 08079 | $740,422 |
14 | Myerwood Farms | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $700,302 |
15 | Wood Farms | Salem, NJ 08079 | $665,000 |
16 | E & D Farms LLC | Carneys Point, NJ 08069 | $646,893 |
17 | John W Cook | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $641,632 |
18 | R Donald Emel | Salem, NJ 08079 | $607,180 |
19 | Nelson Farms | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $603,501 |
20 | Coombs Sod Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $602,864 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>