Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,398
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in New Mexico totaled $18,386,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Perez Cattle Company LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $46,034 |
42 | Leigh Murphy | Yeso, NM 88136 | $44,954 |
43 | Harrington Ranch Partners | Mimbres, NM 88049 | $44,492 |
44 | Double M Cattle LLC | Lovington, NM 88260 | $44,370 |
45 | T. E. Mitchell & Son, Inc | Albert, NM 87733 | $43,740 |
46 | One Hundred - Poverty Flats Land & Cattle Company | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $43,183 |
47 | Randy Riley | Mountainair, NM 87036 | $42,986 |
48 | Tray Field | Plains, TX 79355 | $42,951 |
49 | Matthew Connell | Mountainair, NM 87036 | $42,855 |
50 | Elliot Lloyd Bachicha | Anton Chico, NM 87711 | $42,680 |
51 | Eugene Johnson & Son's Ranch | Cuba, NM 87013 | $42,527 |
52 | 2c Ranch General Partnership | Tyrone, NM 88065 | $42,091 |
53 | J D Read | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $42,059 |
54 | James O Bar - Land & Cattle LLC | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $42,024 |
55 | Gents Cattle Co Inc | Roswell, NM 88203 | $41,556 |
56 | Tailgate Cattle Co LLC | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $41,295 |
57 | Double Springs Ranch LLC | Monticello, NM 87939 | $41,242 |
58 | , | $41,129 | |
59 | Johnson Ranches LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $41,105 |
60 | Norris Cattle Co LLC | Lovington, NM 88260 | $40,981 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”