Livestock Forage Disaster Program in New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,824
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in New Mexico totaled $32,911,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Armand And Craig Smith Partnershi | Clovis, NM 88102 | $94,413 |
62 | Butterfield Trail Ranch LLC | Deming, NM 88031 | $94,087 |
63 | Robert E Jones | Dell City, TX 79837 | $92,856 |
64 | V Seven Ranch Co | Raton, NM 87740 | $92,025 |
65 | J & W Cattle Co | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $91,154 |
66 | Lansford Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $90,702 |
67 | Davis Spear Ranch | Portales, NM 88130 | $90,438 |
68 | 4mcc Cattle Co LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $89,411 |
69 | Trigg Cattle Company | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $88,604 |
70 | Paul A Herrera | Tatum, NM 88267 | $88,369 |
71 | Teel Durrett | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $88,204 |
72 | Lewis Cain Ranch Inc | Truth Or Consequence, NM 87901 | $88,159 |
73 | Rafter J L Ranch Ltd Partnership | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $88,047 |
74 | Joe Bill Nunn | Deming, NM 88030 | $88,024 |
75 | Alamocita Ranch Company | Logan, NM 88426 | $87,186 |
76 | Bar W Ranch Inc | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $87,175 |
77 | Hage & Webb Land & Cattle Inc | Garita, NM 88421 | $86,458 |
78 | 1880 Cattle Co | Lordsburg, NM 88045 | $85,500 |
79 | Tailgate Cattle Co LLC | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $85,496 |
80 | Kincaid Brothers | Pinon, NM 88344 | $85,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”