Environmental Quality Incentives Program in New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,062
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in New Mexico totaled $25,427,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jimmie F Wheeler | Lovington, NM 88260 | $67,799 |
42 | Bonita Canyon Ranch Lp | Santa Fe, NM 87504 | $66,731 |
43 | Creamer Ranch | Milnesand, NM 88125 | $66,676 |
44 | Acoma Business Enterprises Dba Acoma Land And Catt | Pueblo Of Acoma, NM 87034 | $65,538 |
45 | Dencil Gillis | Hatch, NM 87937 | $62,640 |
46 | Don Hartman | Deming, NM 88030 | $62,466 |
47 | Anthony L Benson | Taos, NM 87571 | $61,743 |
48 | R L Rogers | Portales, NM 88130 | $61,405 |
49 | Stephen R Janos & Patricia L Jano | T Or C, NM 87901 | $60,976 |
50 | Richard J Manning | Corona, NM 88318 | $60,684 |
51 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $59,400 |
52 | Perelli Minetti Trust III | Newport Beach, CA 92663 | $57,811 |
53 | Rex & Kathy Rush | Clovis, NM 88101 | $57,323 |
54 | Jeff Spill | Espanola, NM 87532 | $56,065 |
55 | Double L Farms | Lake Arthur, NM 88253 | $55,494 |
56 | Dwain F Woody Trust | Lubbock, TX 79401 | $54,915 |
57 | Pueblo Of Tesque Nobert Leno | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $53,893 |
58 | Koontz Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $53,763 |
59 | Alice M Moore | Raton, NM 87740 | $53,709 |
60 | Galen Zens Dba Zens Dairy | Willard, NM 87063 | $53,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”