Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Catron County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 137
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Catron County, New Mexico totaled $10,037,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harriet Ranch LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $617,867 |
| 2 | Badger Creek Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $477,883 |
| 3 | Hubbell Livestock Company | Quemado, NM 87829 | $383,154 |
| 4 | 7d Holding Company | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $377,668 |
| 5 | 77 Investments LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $360,956 |
| 6 | Henry D Wellborn | Datil, NM 87821 | $336,305 |
| 7 | Jerry Mcphaul | Pie Town, NM 87827 | $333,279 |
| 8 | Marvin & Dorothy Ake Revocable Trust | Magdalena, NM 87825 | $320,357 |
| 9 | Ghost Lake Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $312,368 |
| 10 | Powell Ranch Partnership | Aragon, NM 87820 | $298,095 |
| 11 | Jay D Houston | Quemado, NM 87829 | $281,872 |
| 12 | Joel T Nelson | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $266,223 |
| 13 | Travis Kiehne | Magdalena, NM 87825 | $202,434 |
| 14 | N G Baca | Quemado, NM 87829 | $189,922 |
| 15 | Robert Payne | Clifton, TX 76634 | $178,887 |
| 16 | Whitehouse Ranch Inc | Datil, NM 87821 | $174,877 |
| 17 | Nelson Shirley | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $173,504 |
| 18 | Russell Walraven | Datil, NM 87821 | $163,826 |
| 19 | Bruton-bruton | San Antonio, NM 87832 | $158,704 |
| 20 | James S Heap | Reserve, NM 87830 | $154,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
