Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Catron County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Catron County, New Mexico totaled $1,291,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harriet Ranch LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $146,097 |
2 | Marvin & Dorothy Ake Revocable Trust | Magdalena, NM 87825 | $79,155 |
3 | 77 Investments LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $65,128 |
4 | Nelson Shirley | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $60,159 |
5 | 7d Holding Company | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $57,716 |
6 | Badger Creek Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $52,483 |
7 | Whitehouse Ranch Inc | Datil, NM 87821 | $52,438 |
8 | Robert Payne | Clifton, TX 76634 | $49,385 |
9 | Henry D Wellborn | Datil, NM 87821 | $48,008 |
10 | Audrey Mcqueen | Luna, NM 87824 | $45,523 |
11 | Ghost Lake Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $43,816 |
12 | Powell Ranch Partnership | Aragon, NM 87820 | $38,831 |
13 | Jay D Houston | Quemado, NM 87829 | $34,773 |
14 | Marinel J Poppie | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $34,678 |
15 | Hubbell Livestock Company | Quemado, NM 87829 | $33,707 |
16 | Glen Mccarty Revocable Trust | Reserve, NM 87830 | $29,030 |
17 | Flying W Ranch Inc | Vernon, AZ 85940 | $25,146 |
18 | 76 Slash Cattle LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $25,107 |
19 | Sally L Hulsey | Luna, NM 87824 | $25,004 |
20 | John Cauzza | Quemado, NM 87829 | $23,236 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>