Farm Subsidy information
Chaves County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Chaves County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,027
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chaves County, New Mexico totaled $223,239,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hobson Farms Inc | Roswell, NM 88203 | $1,119,344 |
42 | Arroyo Dairy | Roswell, NM 88203 | $1,116,628 |
43 | Adonis Forest Prod Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $1,101,651 |
44 | H Miller Corn | Roswell, NM 88201 | $1,065,568 |
45 | Marley Ranches Ltd | Roswell, NM 88202 | $1,061,900 |
46 | Jennings Farms | Roswell, NM 88203 | $1,052,449 |
47 | Berry Land & Cattle LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $1,042,179 |
48 | Legacy Land & Livestock LLC | Roswell, NM 88201 | $1,041,800 |
49 | Mike Corn | Roswell, NM 88201 | $1,037,216 |
50 | Sterrett Farms Inc | Dexter, NM 88230 | $1,020,254 |
51 | Charles Ferguson | Roswell, NM 88201 | $1,015,274 |
52 | Wild West Farms | Roswell, NM 88203 | $1,013,521 |
53 | Corn Bros Inc | Roswell, NM 88201 | $996,981 |
54 | Double Aught Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $914,052 |
55 | Diamond Heart Farms Inc | Roswell, NM 88202 | $905,086 |
56 | Penasco River Ranch LLC | Roswell, NM 88202 | $878,205 |
57 | Bonham Farms Inc | Roswell, NM 88201 | $845,360 |
58 | Dean Sons | Roswell, NM 88202 | $842,729 |
59 | Mathis Land And Cattle Inc | Elida, NM 88116 | $822,344 |
60 | Conejo Cattle Co Inc | Dexter, NM 88230 | $791,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”