Total Conservation Programs in Curry County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 330
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Curry County, New Mexico totaled $5,119,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dennis Shaw | Clovis, NM 88101 | $32,313 |
42 | B B Farm LLC | Bethany, OK 73008 | $31,523 |
43 | Aaron Belcher Organic LLC | Melrose, NM 88124 | $31,392 |
44 | Lonnie Frank Sultemeier | Melrose, NM 88124 | $30,868 |
45 | Ronnie And Charlotte Eaton | Clovis, NM 88101 | $29,980 |
46 | Cody Moberly | Melrose, NM 88124 | $29,926 |
47 | Tate Co Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $29,688 |
48 | Wendell Bostwick | Clovis, NM 88101 | $29,523 |
49 | John And Virginia Reid Revocable Living Trust | Clovis, NM 88101 | $29,347 |
50 | Leeann Timberlake | Broadview, NM 88112 | $29,295 |
51 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $28,419 |
52 | Sandra Lee Wells | Ozark, AR 72949 | $28,261 |
53 | Douglas G Screws | Melrose, NM 88124 | $28,053 |
54 | Earl H Hathorn & Dawn C Hathorn Revocable Trust | Las Cruces, NM 88001 | $27,236 |
55 | Keith Orear | Clovis, NM 88101 | $26,359 |
56 | Hardt Family LLC | Portales, NM 88130 | $26,300 |
57 | Larhonda Bailey | Broadview, NM 88112 | $25,929 |
58 | Steve Bailey | Broadview, NM 88112 | $25,929 |
59 | Chayson Lord | Lovington, NM 88260 | $25,675 |
60 | Geraldine Hisel | Clovis, NM 88101 | $25,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”