Farm Subsidy information
Curry County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Curry County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,773
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Curry County, New Mexico totaled $595,580,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cross-road Farms Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,105,230 |
22 | Lansford Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,090,226 |
23 | Bailey Enterprises | Broadview, NM 88112 | $2,026,640 |
24 | Demaio Farms And Ranches Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,019,497 |
25 | Lockmiller Farms | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,954,379 |
26 | Gunnels Farms Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,952,655 |
27 | Pleasant Pastures Inc | Melrose, NM 88124 | $1,943,755 |
28 | H Wayne Martin Jr | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,923,787 |
29 | Helmer Land & Cattle Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,909,834 |
30 | Delbert Sours | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,909,393 |
31 | Toby Bostwick | Melrose, NM 88124 | $1,892,612 |
32 | Blackburn Farms Inc | Broadview, NM 88112 | $1,892,445 |
33 | Double E Ranch Co | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,796,310 |
34 | Sammy And Deborah Merritt | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,783,485 |
35 | Lon Sultemeier Inc | Melrose, NM 88124 | $1,779,914 |
36 | Douglas Reid | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,777,242 |
37 | Cooper Legacy Dairy LLC | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,764,861 |
38 | T & T Farms Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,753,887 |
39 | Phillip Tate | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,731,647 |
40 | Desert Sun Dairy LLC | Clovis, NM 88101 | $1,717,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”