Farm Subsidy information
DeBaca County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in DeBaca County, New Mexico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in DeBaca County, New Mexico totaled $4,504,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Powhatan Carter III | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $58,338 |
22 | Taiban Land & Cattle LLC | Taiban, NM 88134 | $55,557 |
23 | Steele Ranch Incorporated | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $51,003 |
24 | John Fallon | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $49,773 |
25 | 4mcc Cattle Co LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $43,776 |
26 | De Baca Land & Cattle LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $40,055 |
27 | Vp Bar LLC | Clovis, NM 88102 | $39,521 |
28 | Ramon Perez Ranch Inc | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $38,776 |
29 | Happy Bees LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $36,730 |
30 | Lisa Gardner | Estancia, NM 87016 | $35,441 |
31 | Mccollum Cattle Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $34,620 |
32 | William C Schade | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $33,191 |
33 | Bill Gardner | Estancia, NM 87016 | $33,170 |
34 | Barry J Josserand | Canyon, TX 79015 | $31,972 |
35 | Lewis D Hisel | Yeso, NM 88136 | $31,236 |
36 | James C Koontz | Corrales, NM 87048 | $29,849 |
37 | Knox Cortese | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $26,792 |
38 | Pitsauac LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $25,999 |
39 | Cholla Livestock | Yeso, NM 88136 | $21,045 |
40 | Rodney T Mcclain | Taiban, NM 88134 | $20,328 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”