Farm Subsidy information
DeBaca County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in DeBaca County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 432
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in DeBaca County, New Mexico totaled $55,573,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | , | $196,253 | |
62 | Mcree & Brooke | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $192,021 |
63 | El Bigote Cattle Co LLC | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $185,040 |
64 | J D Terral | Causey, NM 88113 | $181,778 |
65 | Ward & Best | Elida, NM 88116 | $175,747 |
66 | Douglas W Johnson | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $175,517 |
67 | Bar Double L Ranch Inc Defined Benefit Plan | Melrose, NM 88124 | $173,610 |
68 | William W West | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $166,430 |
69 | William L Nugent | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $164,476 |
70 | Henry Townsend | Rochelle, TX 76872 | $164,395 |
71 | Joseph Kelly | Roswell, NM 88202 | $164,395 |
72 | Cortese Farm & Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $159,105 |
73 | Stanley T Dunbar | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $158,229 |
74 | The Daniel B Murray Revocable Tru | Belvedere, CA 94920 | $155,176 |
75 | Richard J Nolte | Indian Valley, ID 83632 | $147,248 |
76 | Joe H Gammill | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $143,045 |
77 | Roy Dale Tucker | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $137,403 |
78 | Charles A Hafdell | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $136,186 |
79 | Reeder-lewis Cattle | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $133,797 |
80 | George Hisel Estate | Clovis, NM 88101 | $132,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”