Farm Subsidy information
Dona Ana County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dona Ana County, New Mexico totaled $7,450,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Frank J Garay | Derry, NM 87933 | $2,946 |
122 | Mountain Range Cattle Co. LLC | Chaparral, NM 88081 | $2,946 |
123 | La Pompa LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $2,875 |
124 | Hector Mendoza | Garfield, NM 87936 | $2,824 |
125 | Ubaldo Grajeda | Hatch, NM 87937 | $2,768 |
126 | Tillie Diaz | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $2,692 |
127 | Ronald Watson | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $2,659 |
128 | Ferralez Farm LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $2,640 |
129 | Russell Tharp | Fairacres, NM 88033 | $2,572 |
130 | Lujan LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $2,458 |
131 | Henry James Dimatteo | Mesilla, NM 88046 | $2,452 |
132 | Luanne Burke | Las Cruces, NM 88001 | $2,310 |
133 | Robert Craig Woody | Chaparral, NM 88081 | $2,249 |
134 | Ray Marion Hamilton | Las Cruces, NM 88001 | $2,138 |
135 | Robledo Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $2,052 |
136 | Louis John Corpening Sr Seperate Property Trust-lo | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $2,029 |
137 | Bobren Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88011 | $1,969 |
138 | Chile Connection LLC | Rincon, NM 87940 | $1,857 |
139 | Duran And Sons Inc | Derry, NM 87933 | $1,776 |
140 | Ernest Moralez | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $1,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”