Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 290
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Dona Ana County, New Mexico totaled $7,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | William W Bivins Jr | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $8,960 |
122 | Ric-llan Farms Inc | Anthony, NM 88021 | $8,952 |
123 | Triple L Pecans LLC | Rincon, NM 87940 | $8,882 |
124 | Robert E Berridge | Garfield, NM 87936 | $8,666 |
125 | Jab Hedging | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $8,570 |
126 | Preston S Tharp | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $8,404 |
127 | Sleeping Joseph LLC | Santa Teresa, NM 88008 | $8,398 |
128 | Jk Farms LLC | Mesilla Park, NM 88047 | $8,048 |
129 | Lupe Garcia Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $7,798 |
130 | Frank Sloan | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $7,671 |
131 | Ronald Watson | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $7,352 |
132 | The Nelson Nut Farm LLC | Alamogordo, NM 88310 | $7,306 |
133 | J W Wolslager Jr | El Paso, TX 79935 | $7,052 |
134 | John Pinkerton | El Paso, TX 79932 | $6,906 |
135 | A Acosta LLC | Anthony, NM 88021 | $6,824 |
136 | Joe Corona | Anthony, NM 88021 | $6,482 |
137 | Marcello H. Garcia | Hatch, NM 87937 | $6,475 |
138 | V Paul Koenig | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $5,871 |
139 | Robert L Reidel | Las Cruces, NM 88011 | $5,694 |
140 | Robledo Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $5,551 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”