Total Commodity Programs in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,352
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dona Ana County, New Mexico totaled $78,002,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Los Nogales L L C | Canutillo, TX 79835 | $148,698 |
122 | Salopek 4-mp Farms | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $148,649 |
123 | Ubaldo Grajeda | Hatch, NM 87937 | $147,323 |
124 | Riparian Restoration Technologies | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $145,935 |
125 | Bonestroo & Sons Dairy | Portales, NM 88130 | $143,754 |
126 | James & Doris Lack LLC | Garfield, NM 87936 | $142,912 |
127 | Bustamante Farms | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $142,436 |
128 | Corona Farms Inc | Anthony, NM 88021 | $141,454 |
129 | Dilaso Inc | Anthony, NM 88021 | $141,152 |
130 | T & S Growers | Anthony, NM 88021 | $140,690 |
131 | Scott Pearce | Boulder, CO 80302 | $138,549 |
132 | J Irvin Woodward - Deceased | Unknown, NM 99999 | $137,616 |
133 | Firstfruit Orchards Inc | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $137,424 |
134 | Ulmer Inc | Anthony, NM 88021 | $136,574 |
135 | Marty Franzoy | Hatch, NM 87937 | $134,724 |
136 | Joe Aday | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $133,511 |
137 | Keith Deputy | El Paso, TX 79932 | $131,389 |
138 | I L Bustamante | Las Cruces, NM 88005 | $127,740 |
139 | Singhco Inc | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $126,411 |
140 | Jw & Sj LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $126,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”